Domain Musings – The Arbitrage Conspiracy
Over the past few weeks I have been analysing the domain parking model in these domainer musings posts, in a bid to illustrate why so many domainers are hooked in domain parking land.
This series was inspired by a seemingly unwillingness of the masses to accept that domain parking and web development are two extremely different models.
Anyway, you can click to read Part One and Part Two. I am writing these posts solely from my point of view, so please do not accept anything as fact.
Last week I touched a bit on Arbitrage in the domain space. Domainers profited heavily from arbitrage by buying cheap traffic and selling it at a higher price. They would open up PPC campaigns with cheap search engines, send the traffic to parked domains serving ads from the likes of Google and Yahoo who would normally compensate the domainer with higher Revenue Per Clicks.
Some took it a bit further by buying traffic on cheap keywords, only to send the said traffic to landing pages populated with ads for unrelated but more financially rewarding keywords.
To understand the potential of this form of arbitrage (domain) you have to realise the more traffic you bought, the more money you could make, you could use unlimited domains and use just about any domain name despite the quality and/or domain extension.
This was happening in the heyday of domain drops, when all domain registrars were still dropping great domains. So for many domainers, they were in the right place, at the right time.
If any thing can be said about the domain industry is that domainers will do whatever makes them money, for as long as they can. One such act is the registration and selling/parking of typo and trademark domains.
Now in the case of arbitrage, it was a licence to print money for many. The more money they made, the more domains they acquired, and the more traffic they bought. It also meant that more and more domainers were getting in on the action.
Now, to understand where I’m going with this, the only thing you have to do is to look at arbitrage from the advertisers point of view. Then everything else will become clear.
Imagine what would happen when advertisers realise that they are spending the bulk of their search marketing dollars buying “recycled” traffic? It is recycled in the sense that it is not original. The domainer bought it from a cheaper search engine and then sold it to them via Google, Yahoo etc.
The key thing here is that the advertiser would ask is, why buy recycled traffic, when I can go straight to the cheaper source?
The other thing as well is that if a domainer buys traffic for “horse shoes” (keyword) and sells it to an advertiser marketing their mortgage products, then chances are, that traffic will be useless. Useless traffic in this case would simply be a waste of money to the advertiser, but enrichment to the domainer. Getting the picture?
If advertisers had no way of guaranteeing the quality of traffic, and/or continued to receive less value for money, then they would abandon search marketing and advertise elsewhere.
This could render search marketing as an unreliable advertising channel. This would not be good for Google and Yahoo.
As for Google and Yahoo, there were 2 main threats.
Firstly, if advertisers discovered the cheaper source of traffic, then Google and Yahoo would lose money.
The other threat is that if search market is compromised by arbitrage, then the main source of income for Google and Yahoo would become very uncertain.
So, the plug was pulled, and tighter search marketing rules were introduced. These include the rules where advertisers can only purchase ads for keywords relevant to their sites, the destination of the ad has to be domain shown in the ad, and well of course arbitrage was outlawed.
An email I receive from Yahoo earlier this week was of perfect timing. The email was regarding a Notice of Class Action Settlement. This email which you can read here (PDF) will help to legitimise my opinion that arbitrage posed a very severe threat not only to domain parking, but also to search marketing as a whole.
As I have taken the time to provide a copy of the email in PDF, I won’t be describing or discussing the email. It is fairly easy for the average mind to understand it.
However, for the purpose of this article, here is a quote:
”This class action was brought in 2006 by several Yahoo! pay-per-click search advertising customers. They allege that customers contracted for targeted ad placements through two products, “Sponsored Search” and “Content Match” (and predecessor products provided by Overture Services, Inc. and GoTo.com, Inc.) and that Yahoo! breached its contract with its customers by allowing Yahoo! ads to be displayed in spyware, domain name parking sites (also known as bulk registration sites), pop-ups, pop-unders, and typosquatting sites. Plaintiffs brought claims for breach of contract, unjust enrichment, misrepresentation, civil conspiracy, and unfair business practices.”
In a nutshell, what you need to get here is that regardless of all the domaining trumpets and megaphones been blown and sounded, domaining is still viewed as shady business by the masses.
As a matter of fact, the only people that seem to have respect for domaining are domainers themselves. Yes, we have had the million dollar sales, lavish conferences, a robust domain aftermarket and a few respectable players, but at the end of the day, the domain industry’s reputation is still far being credible and acceptable to many.
So a lot of advertisers would squeal at the idea of their ads showing up on parked pages. As per the Yahoo Notice of Class Action Settlement email, advertisers seem to have a general mistrust of the domain space.
I am going to end here. Would love to hear your thoughts.
![]()
Need an affordable premium domain for your eBusiness?
Choose from over 500,000
quality aftermarket domains at eBusinessDomains.com!
Simply enter your keyword and click search in the Domain Search Box.
Instant domain transfer with most domains!
Domains | Domain Auctions | Premium Domains | Domain Newsletter | Domain Forum | Funny Games







